|
"Look up in the sky. It's a bird. It's a plane. It's Superman." Not since 1987's far from super effort, "Quest
for Peace," has the Man of Steel appeared on the big screen. But after a long hiatus, he returns, faster than a
speeding bullet. Picking up where "Superman II" left off, the film follows Superman's return to Earth after a five
year journey to Krypton ends in disappointment and despair. But perhaps even more damaging is the universal rejection
he receives from a world that no longer needs him. At least, until Lex Luthor shows up and starts making a continental
mess of things. Directed by Bryan Singer, whose work on the X-Men franchise earned him favorable comic credibility,
"Superman Returns" combines retro style with visual panache. At the center of attention is the casting of Brandon
Routh, who does an admirable job filling in for the late Christopher Reeve. But it's not enough to keep the story
from plodding along, as disjointed and erratic as years of development heck would indicate. And while this updated
Superman is quite capable of leaping tall buildings in a single bound, it does so without much care or
conviction.
After saving the world from Zod and his evil henchmen in "Superman II," the Man of Steel journeys to the far reaches
of the galaxy, searching for survivors from his home world, Krypton. It's a mission that takes roughly five years
and one that produces zero results. Saddened by his lack of findings, Superman crashes back down to Earth outside
the Kent farm in Kansas, empty handed and alone. Nursed back to health by his mother, Martha Kent, he regains his
strength and heads back to Metropolis as his alter ego, Clark Kent, to get his old job back. However, his return
is not well received. Of most significance, he is heartbroken to discover that the woman he loves, Lois Lane, has
moved on with her life. In particular, she is engaged to Richard White, the young nephew of the Daily Planet's
Editor-in-Chief. And the two even have a son named Jason. Worse still, Clark discovers that the world has gotten
used to Superman's absence. In fact, an embittered Lois Lane has even earned a Pulitzer for an essay entitled, "Why
the World Doesn't Need Superman."
Yet, while Metropolis is no longer the same superhero haven, some things never change. Arch nemesis Lex Luthor
has been released from prison and has come into a large sum of money. Along with a group of thugs, he and his
partner in crime, Kitty Kawalski, venture to Superman's Fortress of Solitude, and steal a handful of generative
crystals. The crystals, when met with water, have the ability to grow large objects, even landmasses. Which is
precisely Luthor's intent - to create his very own continent, flooding the entire United States in the
process. And yet, with a damaged ego, a lost love, and a displaced home, Superman returns to save mankind
once more. Making the ultimate sacrifice in the process, he proves through his actions that the world truly
needs a superhero. A Superman.
Throughout the years, Superman has gone through many reincarnations. But it was his first appearance in Action Comics #1
back in 1938 that is the most regarded. In fact, it's a cover so well known that director Bryan Singer pays tribute in
"Superman Returns" in a scene where the Man of Steel rescues a woman from a car without brakes. From that point forward,
Superman went on to become one of the most popular superheroes of all time. He was featured in a newspaper strip for over
thirty years, a series of animated shorts in 1941, and two live action serials. All before the first feature film
entitled "Superman and the Mole-Men," back in 1951 and starring George Reeves. Then, in 1978, the first contemporary
rendition of Superman hit the big screen. Starring a relative unknown, Christopher Reeve, and heavy hitter Marlon Brando,
Richard Donner's interpretation went on to big success, spawning three sequels, the latter two of which were so bad that
"Superman Returns" ignores their very existence.
Depending on whom you ask, the projected budget for "Superman Returns" ballooned to a whopping $260 million, more if you
include all of the money spent on failed scripts and directors over the last ten years. But much of that money was also
spent on special effects. And they certainly don't disappoint. In the 21st Century, Superman rockets through the air at
high speeds without quirky blue screens, he gently hovers above ground fluidly, and the weight ratio and gravity details
seem to be well under control. The film even resuscitates Superman's father, Jor-El, played by the late Marlon Brando by
using computer technology based on cyber and lumispheric scans. Overall, the film incorporates some 1,400 visual effects
shots, but none as stunning as the sequence involving the rescue of a super space shuttle and a passenger plane. It's a
sequence well worth the price of admission.
Heading into the film, it was hard not to question the casting of a relative unknown in the leading role - Des
Moines native, Brandon Routh. After all, it's a role that was so synonymous with the late Christopher Reeve,
who gave Superman and Clark Kent such charisma, strength and virtue, and above all, humor. And with Dana
Reeve's blessing to go forward, Routh appears in the film, oftentimes eerily resembling Reeve himself and
other times, like a mannequin at Saks 5th Avenue. But apart from the uncanny resemblance, Routh actually
does the role justice. Even though the red boots are hard to fill and the role lacks the words or dialogue
you would expect from a leading character, Routh brings a quiet warmth and tenderness to Superman that would
have made the Reeves proud.
Unfortunately, however, the same cannot be said for the rest of the cast. There's just no energy, no excitement, and no
fun. It's as if the actors are going through the motions without a care for their characters' feelings, relationships,
or situations. In particular, there's Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane, a character that seems so depressed, so clueless, and
deflated that she makes Clark Kent look like an extrovert. A far cry from Margot Kidder's sarcastic, edgy, and fallible
reporter who carried loads of sass and sureness, perfectly complementary to Reeve's upstanding and wholesome Superman,
Bosworth sets a joyless tone. Along with James Marsden, who faithfully plays her tag along fianc?, Richard White, the
film never emerges from the depths of despair. Even the gifted talents of Kevin Spacey, cast as the maniacal Lex Luther,
are wasted, downplayed in dutiful and delusional fashion.
For Superman, Kryptonite represents his biggest weakness. And for the film, it's continuity. Supposedly, the story takes
place after the events of "Superman II," but it becomes glaringly obvious that it does so only when convenient for the
plot. After all, why is it that no one catches on to the fact that Clark Kent and Superman have both been gone for five
years? Additionally, there are major plot snafus involving Krypotonite, the durability of the Supersuit, Lois Lane's son,
and the conflict between a modern Metropolis and a vintage set design and wardrobe. Much of this can be attributed to the
string of production woes that cost the project oodles of dollars, many years of production heck, and three remarkably
different directors just to get off the ground. But it will provide little solace to those eager and enthusiastic
audiences, who know the history, the characters, and the storyline through and through.
Dedicated "with love and respect" to Christopher and Dana Reeve, "Superman Returns" certainly has it's heart
in the right place; it's just that it doesn't capture the right spirit, the right synergy. While the special
effects are conspicuously modernized and bold, it's hard to put any weight into them when the rest of the film
has little sense of timing and continuity between events, past and present. Add to that a cast with tepid
enthusiasm and you have a film that is barely breathing, lifeless and ordinary. It's a shame, really. Due
to years of story rework, crew changes, and legalese, a pop icon gets a bad facelift. Was it inevitable?
Probably. But with all the creativity that can be mustered in Hollywood these days, this caped crusader
deserves so much more.
|